labels?

Today’s question is:  Why don’t more people read food labels?

Background: Almost 4 years ago my girls and I stopped eating wheat for health reasons.  Prior to that life change, I had already been checking labels on processed foods for things like red dye #40 (had been linked to hyperactivity in children and God knows I didn’t need any more of that in my house) and an abundance of ingredients.  If a label had too many questionable things I just didn’t buy it.  All of this started when my husband got sick and I was forced to take a look at what I was putting into everyones bodies in our home.  I made a choice back then that I would buy things that were closest to a whole food source.

I wasn’t perfect, and I’ve improved a lot since then.  Now that we don’t eat wheat we just have a lot less processed foods in the house.  Everyone is just used to eating whole foods rather than packaged processed foods.

Knowing that I’m a label reader, it will come as no surprise that I know which brands of some items have less ingredients.  Take my favorite cereal growing up, Quaker Oats Peanut Butter Captain Crunch, for instance, against the more natural Mother’s brand Bumpers.

Quaker Oats Peanut Butter Captain Crunch:

Ingredients: CORN FLOUR, SUGAR, PEANUT BUTTER (PEANUTS, DEXTROSE, HYDROGENATED VEGETABLE OIL [COTTONSEED AND RAPESEED OIL]**, SALT), OAT FLOUR, RICE FLOUR, COCONUT OIL, SALT, CARAMEL COLOR, NIACINAMIDE*, REDUCED IRON, ZINC OXIDE, BHT (A PRESERVATIVE), THIAMIN MONONITRATE*, PYRIDOXINE HYDROCHLORIDE*, RIBOFLAVIN*, FOLIC ACID*.
*ONE OF THE B VITAMINS.
**ADDS A DIETARILY INSIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF TRANS FAT
Mother’s Peanut Butter Bumpers:

Ingredients: Corn flour, unsulphured molasses, natural peanut butter (ground peanuts, salt), oat flour, rice flour, salt, honey, and natural mixed tocopherols (vitamin E).

Kind of a big difference for essentially the same flavor, huh?  Knowing they taste the same why would you buy the Quaker product?  It’s just adding extra stuff into your body that, my opinion, it doesn’t need.
So on that note, I have to bring up an article I read today.  It’s about baby formula, which I can say I used but only in extremely limited quantities.  I never once looked at a label on a can of baby formula, never, ever once.  I knew, as most moms do, that it must be chalk full of good ingredients because why else would we be feeding it to our babies instead of the milk we produce?
Apparently, I should have been paying attention but that was long before Paul got sick and before I realized all food isn’t what it’s cracked up to be.  So I’m going to show you this article that was linked to me via a friend on Twitter (@healthyjasmine).  The website is a health site called Natural News.  This article talks about the recall on Similac formulas because they found traces of beetles and beetle larvae in them (and believe me I know how disgusting that is because of the time I found a worm in my dried dill spice).  The author, Mike Adams, makes some pretty valid observations that spoke to me so much I had to tell you about it.  Here is an excerpt from his article, be sure to click the link and read it in it’s entirety.
{excerpt}
I purchased a 24-oz container of Similac Go & Grow soy-based formula, emblazoned with a cute teddy bear on the front label and positioned towards “9 to 24 months.” It comes with the claim “balanced nutrition for older babies.” But is it really balanced nutrition?

42.6% corn syrup solids

The very first ingredient, shown right on the label, is 42.6% CORN SYRUP SOLIDS.
I took a picture of the ingredients label so you can see it for yourself. Click here to see the pic: http://naturalnews.com/images/Simil…
Stop right there. Are they saying that Similac infant formula is 42.6% corn syrup solids? That’s a form of highly processed sugar. Is this really what infants need — nearly half their formula to be made of corn syrup sugars? Nutritionists would strongly disagree.

{end excerpt}
It gets worse, there is actually more sugar in there than just the corn syrup.  He even goes on to question the price.  And it’s true, why are they charging so much?  
Read your labels, read your labels, read your labels.  This stuff is really important.
September 27, 2010 @ 2:28 pm

2 hours?

Today’s question is:  Who plays the same song in the car for 2 hours straight?

Background: Where’s the waving hand like a crazy woman icon when you need it?

Me.  Apparently, I play a song in the car for 2 hours straight.  The funny thing is, I had no idea I was doing it.

Seriously.

The kids and I got up very early on a Monday morning in July.  The plan was to be on the road to a friends lake house in Indiana early enough to avoid the city traffic in Chicago.  Right when we got into the car I had one of the kids give me their Ipod to play through the radio.  Daphne gave me hers and I started playing it.  The song was very upbeat and fun to listen to.  I liked it.  The next song was very upbeat and fun to listen to also.  About an hour into the drive, all I could think about was how great her playlist was, how every song was so upbeat and fun.  I had playlist envy, even though we all have the same itunes account!

About 2 hours into the ride, my lovely little Daphne said “mom, can you please turn the repeat off on the ipod?”.  To which I replied “what? huh? what are you talking about?”  And she said “mom, you’ve been playing the same song the whole time we’ve been in the car.”  I’m pretty sure at this point I called her a liar.  I mean really, really there is no way this cool music has been the same song for the last two hours, no way.

Then I picked up the ipod and pressed the buttons she said to press and OMG, I mean OMG, she was right, I played the same exact song for the last 2 hours, the same song.  How could I have done that and not known?  I have no idea.

Let’s just say the next two hours weren’t nearly as upbeat and fun.  I have had more laughs about this crazy drive than I can count in the last 6 weeks.  I still just can’t believe I had no idea I was playing the same song for so long.  I must have been really concentrating on the road!

September 13, 2010 @ 11:20 pm

soccer?

Today’s question is:  Why do kids sign up to play soccer when they don’t want to run?

Background:  For the second time in 2 years I’m one of the soccer coaches for my daughters soccer team.

As the coach I simply cannot understand why parents sign their kids up for this sport when they don’t want to run.  In 5th grade, most soccer positions require a fair amount of running.  Only goalie is minimal running, but most girls don’t want to play that position.

What is the coach supposed to do when you’ve got a girl that won’t run on a soccer team?  It really is a running sport. What do you do?  Where do you put a non running, would rather not be goalie, player in this sport?

Why sign up if you don’t want to meet the requirement?  I just don’t get it.

I sort of wish someone could explain this to me.  Wouldn’t you pick a sport, you know, where you don’t have to run?

There are plenty of sports that would be perfect for the non runner, some of them are:

fencing
swimming
dance
golf
badmitten
water polo
rowing

What is a coach supposed to do?

September 7, 2010 @ 9:44 pm

signage?

Today’s question is:  Why are some signs so hilarious?

Background: the bike riders I know, may not heed warning, but isn’t this hilarious?  The bridge in question had some water running along it, but was by no means all that dangerous (aside from the water along the bridge).  This sign pretty much killed me though.  How funny is this?  OMG.

For the record this sign is found in Tucson, AZ.  Ride bikes at risk!

September 3, 2010 @ 11:36 pm